The 54th Grammys went down with the usual pomp, star-studded lineup, bizarre fashion choices and glitzy musical performances. But are people over the Grammys? If not the general public, the artists might be.
Several artists, including Eddie Vedder of Pearl Jam fame, have turned down nominations in the past and criticized the awards show as meaningless and insubstantial. First of all, when you’re dealing with such a wide range of artists and constant musical evolution, it appears difficult to narrow down the songs into appropriate categories. For example, nominees for Best Rock Song included Mumford & Son’s “The Cave” and Coldplay’s “Every Teardrop is a Waterfall” — neither of which is typically categorized under the rock label by fans and the artists themselves. Naturally, neither of these songs went home with a gold trophy.
And even if the categories were more aptly apportioned, is it feasible that you can select a panel of voters who a) have legitimately listened to every song nominated, and b) can remain unbiased about personal music preferences? The subjectivity of the event is a turnoff to many artists.
But the general public? For the most part, give them a few shots of Lady Gaga and mock-worthy moments to tweet about and they’re just as happy with their viewing experience as ever.
What do you think? Is it even about the music anymore?






